4.7 Article

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria item performance

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 80, 期 6, 页码 775-781

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219373

关键词

lupus erythematosus; systemic; antibodies; antiphospholipid; autoantibodies; synovitis

资金

  1. EULAR
  2. ACR
  3. Intramural Research Programme of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the performance of individual criteria items in the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, finding varying sensitivity among the specific items. By introducing a new entry criterion and attribution rule, the overall specificity of the criteria set was significantly improved.
Background/objectives The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus system showed high specificity, while attaining also high sensitivity. We hereby analysed the performance of the individual criteria items and their contribution to the overall performance of the criteria. Methods We combined the EULAR/ACR derivation and validation cohorts for a total of 1197 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and n=1074 non-SLE patients with a variety of conditions mimicking SLE, such as other autoimmune diseases, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and the 23 specific criteria items. We also tested performance omitting the EULAR/ACR criteria attribution rule, which defines that items are only counted if not more likely explained by a cause other than SLE. Results Positive ANA, the new entry criterion, was 99.5% sensitive, but only 19.4% specific, against a non-SLE population that included other inflammatory rheumatic, infectious, malignant and metabolic diseases. The specific criteria items were highly variable in sensitivity (from 0.42% for delirium and 1.84% for psychosis to 75.6% for antibodies to double-stranded DNA), but their specificity was uniformly high, with low C3 or C4 (83.0%) and leucopenia <4.000/mm(3) (83.8%) at the lowest end. Unexplained fever was 95.3% specific in this cohort. Applying the attribution rule improved specificity, particularly for joint involvement. Conclusions Changing the position of the highly sensitive, non-specific ANA to an entry criterion and the attribution rule resulted in a specificity of >80% for all items, explaining the higher overall specificity of the criteria set.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据