4.4 Article

How animal agriculture stakeholders define, perceive, and are impacted by antimicrobial resistance: challenging the Wellcome Trust's Reframing Resistance principles

期刊

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 893-909

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-021-10197-y

关键词

Antimicrobial resistance; Animal agriculture; Qualitative research; Antimicrobial use; Animal husbandry; One Health

资金

  1. ARES Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans, animals, and the environment are facing a universal crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AR), with underdeveloped efforts to address it in various sectors, including human and veterinary medicine. Stakeholders from the animal agriculture sector, one of the largest purchasers of antimicrobial drugs, have differing views on AR and how to address it. The need for consistent messaging efforts to describe the global implications of the AR crisis has been proposed, but there is a gap between recommendations and the perspectives of animal agriculture stakeholders.
Humans, animals, and the environment face a universal crisis: antimicrobial resistance (AR). Addressing AR and its multi-disciplinary causes across many sectors including in human and veterinary medicine remains underdeveloped. One barrier to AR efforts is an inconsistent process to incorporate the plenitude of stakeholders about what AR is and how to stifle its development and spread-especially stakeholders from the animal agriculture sector, one of the largest purchasers of antimicrobial drugs. In 2019, The Wellcome Trust released Reframing Resistance: How to communicate about antimicrobial resistance effectively (Reframing Resistance), which proposed the need to establish a consistent and harmonized messaging effort that describes the AR crisis and its global implications for health and wellbeing across all stakeholders. Yet, Reframing Resistance does not specifically engage the animal agriculture community. This study investigates the gap between two principles recommended by Reframing Resistance and animal agriculture stakeholders. For this analysis, the research group conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of United States animal agriculture stakeholders. Participants reported attitudes, beliefs, and practices about a variety of issues, including how they defined AR and what entities the AR crisis impacts most. Exploration of Reframing Resistance's Principle 2, explain the fundamentals succinctly and Principle 3, emphasis that this is universal issue; it can affect anyone, including you reveals disagreement in both the fundamentals of AR and consensus of who the AR crisis impacts. Principle 2 may do better to acknowledge that animal agriculture stakeholders espouse a complex array of perspectives that cannot be summed up in a single perspective or principle. As a primary tool to combat AR, behavior change must be accomplished first through outreach to stakeholder groups and understanding their perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据