期刊
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103036
关键词
Rice; Soybean; Yield; Lowland environment; Profit
资金
- Research Foundation of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) [17/2551-0000775-1]
- Global Engagement Office at the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at UNL
- FAPESP-UNL SPRINT Program [2017/50445-0]
- International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI)
- Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
The introduction of soybean into the lowland continuous rice system in southern Brazil has shown an increase in rice yield and total income, despite a decrease in overall output due to the rotation. While the soybean-rice rotation has advantages such as lower labor requirements and higher benefit-to-cost ratio, economic risks and constraints from other factors need to be considered.
Lowland irrigated rice in southern Brazil is typically grown in monoculture, with one rice crop per year. However, during the past 10 years, some farmers have switched from the traditional continuous rice system to a 2-y soybean-rice rotation. Here we performed an on-farm assessment about the impact of introducing soybean to the lowland continuous rice system in southern Brazil. The goal was to determine how the soybean-rice rotation compared to continuous rice in terms of yield and profit. We used farmer-reported survey data collected from lowland rice-based systems in southern Brazil over three growing seasons. Cropping-system yield, profit, and return-to-inputs were compared between fields following continuous rice versus soybean-rice rotation. In addition to the survey data analysis, we evaluated the long-term economic impact of adopting the rotation using a combination of a crop simulation model and Monte-Carlo stochastic modeling. Average rice yield was 26% higher in the rotation compared to continuous rice. Besides the rotation effect, sowing date, N fertilizer, and weed management explained most of the field-to-field variability in rice yield. Cropping-system yield and gross income were lower in the soybean-rice rotation than in continuous rice as a result of replacing an irrigated crop (rice) by a water-limited rainfed crop (soybean). Despite that yield penalty, there was no difference in net economic return between the two cropping systems due to lower production costs in soybean-rice rotation compared to continuous rice. The rotation also exhibited smaller labor requirement and higher benefit-to-cost ratio and return to labor than continuous rice. Despite these potential benefits, our long-term analysis indicated higher inter-annual variability and economic risk in the rotation compared to continuous rice. Other factors further constrain adoption of the soybean-rice rotation, including the high risk of growing soybean in fields that are prone to excess water and difficulties to change current farm logistics. Findings from this study are relevant to other rice-based systems in the world looking for opportunities to increase or maintain net profit while reducing costs and/or labor.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据