4.6 Review

Association Between Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: Revisited

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.625579

关键词

periodontal therapy; relation; periodontal disease; cardiovascular diseases; atherosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periodontitis is potentially a risk factor for the development of atheroma in the arteries, highlighting the association between periodontal disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Early diagnosis and treatment of periodontitis may be crucial in reducing complications associated with ACVDs. Further research with longer follow-up is needed to confirm the causal relationship between periodontal disease and ACVDs.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) is an inflammatory disease of the coronary arteries associated with atheroma formation, which can cause disability and often death. Periodontitis is ranked as the sixth most prevalent disease affecting humans affecting 740 million people worldwide. In the last few decades, researchers have focused on the effect of periodontal disease (PD) on cardiovascular disease. The aim of this review was to investigate the association between these two diseases. PD is a potential risk factor that may initiate the development, maturation, and instability of atheroma in the arteries. Two mechanisms were proposed to explain such association, either periodontal pathogens directly invade bloodstream or indirectly by increasing systemic level of inflammatory mediators. Interestingly, it has been suggested that improvement in the condition of one disease positively impact the condition of the other one. Highlighting the association between these two diseases, the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of PD and its impact on cardiovascular status may be of great value in reducing the complications associated with ACVDs. Further in vitro and in vivo studies with longer follow up are necessary to confirm the causal relationship between PD and ACVDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据