4.7 Article

Assessment of Advanced Glycation End Products and Receptors and the Risk of Dementia

期刊

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Erasmus University Medical Center
  2. Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development
  3. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly
  4. Netherlands Genomics Initiative
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  6. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports
  7. European Commission
  8. Municipality of Rotterdam [201606170110]
  9. China Scholarship Council for PhD fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the AGE-RAGE system is associated with cognitive decline and dementia cross-sectionally but not longitudinally. This suggests a short-term association or reverse causality. Further research is needed to confirm cross-sectional associations between higher skin autofluorescence and cognitive function, as well as the association with APOE status.
IMPORTANCE Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptor (RAGE) are implicated in the pathophysiological processes of dementia and potentially underlie the association of diabetes with neurodegeneration. However, longitudinal studies examining this association are lacking. OBJECTIVE To determine whether markers of the AGE-RAGE system are associated with prevalent and incident dementia and with cognition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this population-based cohort study including participants from the prospective Rotterdam Study, extracellular newly identified RAGE binding protein (EN-RAGE) and soluble RAGE (S-RAGE) were measured in plasma collected between 1997 and 1999 in a random selection of participants, and additionally in participants with prevalent dementia. Participants without dementia were followed up for dementia until 2016. Skin AGEs, measured as skin autofluorescence, and cognition were measured between 2013 and 2016 in participants without dementia. Data analysis was performed from June 2019 to December 2019. EXPOSURES EN-RAGE, S-RAGE, and skin autofluorescence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalent and incident dementia and cognition, adjusted for potential confounders, including age, sex, diabetes, educational level, APOE epsilon 4 carrier status, smoking, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS Of 3889 included participants (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [8.9] years; 2187 [56.2%] women), 1021 participants had data on plasma markers (mean [SD] age 73.6 [7.8] years; 564 [55.2%] women), 73 participants had dementia at baseline, and during 10 711 person-years of follow-up, 161 participants developed incident dementia. Compared with low levels, high EN-RAGE level was associated with a higher prevalence of dementia (odds ratio [OR], 3.68 [95% CI, 1.50-8.03]; P = .003), while high S-RAGE level was associated with a lower prevalence of dementia (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17-0.78]; P = .01). These associations attenuated in a longitudinal setting, with hazard ratios of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-1.01) for high EN-RAGE (P = .05) and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.82-1.81) for high S-RAGE (P = .33). Among 2890 participants without dementia (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [9.4] years; 1640 [57%] women), higher skin autofluorescence was associated with lower global cognitive function (adjusted difference in z score per 1-SD higher skin autofluorescence, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.04]), especially among carriers of the APOE epsilon 4 allele (adjusted difference in z score per 1-SD higher skin autofluorescence, -0.15 [95% CI, -0.22 to -0.07]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that the AGE-RAGE system is associated with cognitive decline and dementia cross-sectionally but not longitudinally. This indicates either a short-term association or reverse causality. Findings of cross-sectional associations between higher skin autofluorescence and lower cognitive function and an association with APOE status also warrant replication and prospective studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据