4.7 Article

Novel Comprehensive Molecular and Ecological Study Introducing Coastal Mud Shrimp (Solenocera Crassicornis) Recorded at the Gulf of Suez, Egypt

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9010009

关键词

Penaeoidea; Solenoceridae; shrimp; Suez Gulf; Red Sea; DNA barcoding; 18S rRNA; COI

资金

  1. Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs (DSRVCH) at King Saud University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the characteristics of Solenocera crassicornis in Egypt, including morphology and molecular identification, confirming its Indo-West Pacific origin. Females of S. crassicornis were found to be heavier than males.
Solenocera crassicornis is a commercially important shrimp of the Solenoceridae family. The current study investigated the morphology, molecular identification, phylogenetic relationships, and population dynamics of S. crassicornis in Egypt. Samples were collected monthly (total, 1722; male = 40.19%, wet weight, 0.89-10.77 g; female = 59.81%, wet weight, 1.55-19.24 g) from Al-Attaka commercial catch in the Gulf of Suez in the Red Sea. Two barcode markers, 18S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), were used for molecular identification. COI partial sequences were used to construct the phylogenetic relationships among different species of genus Solenocera and to infer the origin of the studied Solenocera crassicornis. The applied molecular markers successfully identified the studied species to the species level. The genetic distances among S. crassicornis sequences from different countries revealed the Indo-West Pacific origin of S. crassicornis. The relationship between total length (TL) and total weight (TW) was TW = 0.035TL(2.275) and r(2) = 0.805 for males and TW = 0.007TL(3.036) and r(2) = 0.883 for females, indicating that females were heavier than males. Despite its social and economic relevance in the area, information on the hatching, larval rearing, and farming of S. crassicornis is scarce and requires future studies under Egyptian conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据