4.6 Article

A Gnotobiotic Model to Examine Plant and Microbiome Contributions to Survival under Arsenic Stress

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9010045

关键词

gnotobiotic; biome; endophytic bacteria; arsenic; healthy plant

资金

  1. USDA-NIFA Multistate Project [W3147]
  2. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the microbiome of seeds plays a role in plant seedling growth under arsenic stress, with specific endophytic bacteria inoculation promoting plant recovery. However, the effectiveness of a bacterial mixture in promoting plant recovery under arsenic stress may be influenced by bacterial interactions within the mixture.
So far, the relative importance of the plant and its microbiome in the development of early stages of plant seedling growth under arsenic stress has not been studied. To test the role of endophytic bacteria in increasing plant success under arsenic stress, gnotobiotic seeds of J. montana were inoculated with two endophytic bacteria: Pantoea conspicua MC-K1 (PGPB and As resistant bacteria) and Arthrobacter sp. MC-D3A (non-helper and non-As resistant bacteria) and an endobacteria mixture. In holobiotic seedlings (with seed-vectored microbes intact), neither the capacity of germination nor development of roots and lateral hairs was affected at 125 mu M As(V). However, in gnotobiotic seedlings, the plants are negatively impacted by absence of a microbiome and presence of arsenic, resulting in reduced growth of roots and root hairs. The inoculation of a single PGPB (P. conspicua-MCK1) shows a tendency to the recovery of the plant, both in arsenic enriched and arsenic-free media, while the inoculation with Arthrobacter sp. does not help in the recovery of the plants. Inoculation with a bacterial mixture allows recovery of plants in arsenic free media; however, plants did not recover under arsenic stress, probably because of a bacterial interaction in the mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据