4.6 Article

Impact of Meyerozyma guilliermondii isolated from chickens against Eimeria sp protozoan, an in vitro analysis

期刊

BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0589-0

关键词

Avian coccidiosis; Oocyst; Meyerozyma guilliermondii; Anticoccidial

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [CB-2012-182225]
  2. Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM)-(CONACyT) Technology Development Project [UAEM/CONACyT_EDantan13_01]
  3. CONACYT [289436, 47895]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Avian coccidiosis is a disease caused worldwide by several species of parasite Eimeria that causes significant economic losses. This disease affects chickens development and production, that most of times is controlled with anticoccidial drugs. Although efforts have been made to address this disease, they have been made to control Eimeria sporozoites, although enteric stages are often vulnerable, however; the parasite oocyst remains a problem that must be controlled, as it has a resistant structure that facilitates dispersion. Despite some commercial products based on chemical compounds have been developed as disinfectants that destroy oocysts, the solution of the problem remains to be solved. Results: In this work, we assessed in vitro anticoccidial activity of a compound(s) secreted by yeast isolated in oocysts suspension from infected chickens. The yeast was molecularly identified as Meyerozyma guilliermondii, and its anticoccidial activity against Eimeria tenella oocysts was assessed. Here, we report the damage to oocysts walls caused by M. guilliermondii culture, supernatant, supernatant extract and intracellular proteins. In all cases, a significant decreased of oocysts was observed. Conclusions: The yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii secretes a compound with anticoccidial activity and also has a compound of protein nature that damages the resistant structure of oocyst, showing the potential of this yeast and its products as a feasible method of coccidiosis control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据