4.8 Article

EARN: Enhanced ADR With Coding Rate Adaptation in LoRaWAN

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 11873-11883

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3005881

关键词

Internet of Things; Protocols; Scalability; Adaptation models; Signal to noise ratio; Downlink; Encoding; Adaptive data rate (ADR); coding rate (CR); Internet of Things (IoT); LoRaWAN; low-power wide-area (LPWA) networks; scalability

资金

  1. Institute for Industrial System Innovation
  2. Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [2016R1A5A1012966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As low-power wide-area (LPWA) networks emerge as a cost-effective choice of technologies for city-wide Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications, LoRaWAN, one of the most promising unlicensed band techniques, has received much attention from academia. LoRaWAN presents a set of tunable transmission parameters, along with an adaptive data rate (ADR) mechanism, to promote the best performance under the variable link state. But the performance of ADR, whose design neglects the complex correlation between such parameters, is yet to be practical in terms of both efficiency and scalability. In this article, we derive theoretical performance models of class A unconfirmed-mode LoRaWAN, focusing on the impact of coding rate (CR), a parameter that has not been explored in prior researches. Then, we present EARN, an enhanced greedy ADR mechanism with CR adaptation, to optimize the tradeoff between delivery ratio and energy consumption. In EARN design, we leverage the capture effect to increase the survival rate of colliding signals and introduce a concept of adaptive SNR margin to endure noisy link states. We validate our models and the feasibility of the CR adaptation with an empirical study, and large-scale simulations reveal that our method outperforms the conventional schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据