4.7 Article

Parliament2: Accurate structural variant calling at scale

期刊

GIGASCIENCE
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa145

关键词

structural variation; next-generation sequencing; high-throughput sequencing

资金

  1. NHGRI Centers for Common Disease Genomics [5UM1HG008898-02]
  2. DNAnexus
  3. NHGRI ANVIL [5U24HG010263]
  4. NHGRI CCDG [UM1 HG008898]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Structural variants (SVs) are critical contributors to genetic diversity and genomic disease. To predict the phenotypic impact of SVs, there is a need for better estimates of both the occurrence and frequency of SVs, preferably from large, ethnically diverse cohorts. Thus, the current standard approach requires the use of short paired-end reads, which remain challenging to detect, especially at the scale of hundreds to thousands of samples. Findings: We present Parliament2, a consensus SV framework that leverages multiple best-in-class methods to identify high-quality SVs from short-read DNA sequence data at scale. Parliament2 incorporates pre-installed SV callers that are optimized for efficient execution in parallel to reduce the overall runtime and costs. We demonstrate the accuracy of Parliament2 when applied to data from NovaSeq and HiSeq X platforms with the Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) SV call set across all size classes. The reported quality score per SV is calibrated across different SV types and size classes. Parliament2 has the highest F1 score (74.27%) measured across the independent gold standard from GIAB. We illustrate the compute performance by processing all 1000 Genomes samples (2,691 samples) in <1 day on GRCH38. Parliament2 improves the runtime performance of individual methods and is open source (https://github.com/slzarate /parliament2), and a Docker image, as well as a WDL implementation, is available. Conclusion: Parliament2 provides both a highly accurate single-sample SV call set from short-read DNA sequence data and enables cost-efficient application over cloud or cluster environments, processing thousands of samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据