4.6 Article

Optimization of Microwave and Ultrasound Extraction Methods of Acai Berries in Terms of Highest Content of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10238325

关键词

green extraction; antioxidant compounds; flavonoids; anthocyanins; Euterpe oleracea Mart

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the funds of the Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Department of Technique and Food Product Development, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid technological progress focuses on lowering costs, labor and time. Thus, in order to minimize the expenses of bioactive compound production, great effort is undertaken to optimize the extraction of these compounds. Green extraction is popular and relatively inexpensive. However, the same extraction method does not always work for all types of matrixes due to the biological diversity of the tissue. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the optimal green extraction method of acai berries (ultrasound or microwaves) able to isolate extracts containing the highest possible number of phenolic compounds with the highest antioxidant activity. The results show that the highest content of total phenolic compounds in the extracts was obtained after the application of a temperature of 45 degrees C, using ultrasound for 25 min and 45 min, microwaves for 3.16 min and a water bath for 25 min. Ultrasound turned out to be the most effective method of flavonoid extraction. In turn, the highest anthocyanin content was obtained for microwave extraction. Additionally, the application of microwaves for 4.33 min (45 degrees C) guaranteed the highest ferric-reducing antioxidant activity (FRAP) among the extracts. The results show that the use of microwaves shortens the acai extraction time and ensures both a high content of total phenolic compounds and strong antioxidant activity in the extract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据