4.7 Article

Engineering highly efficient backsplicing and translation of synthetic circRNAs

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 821-834

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.01.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01NS-099371, R01HL089221, R01GM127708, UG3AR-075336, 5T32GM-007092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on circRNAs identified the importance of intron type and length, Alu repeats, IRES elements, and exon length in circRNA formation. Modulating these elements can enhance the design and expression of synthetic circRNAs.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are highly stable RNA molecules that are attractive templates for expression of therapeutic proteins and non-coding RNAs. In eukaryotes, circRNAs are primarily generated by the spliceosome through backsplicing. Here, we interrogate different molecular elements including intron type and length, Alu repeats, internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs), and exon length essential for circRNA formation and exploit this information to engineer robust backsplicing and circRNA expression. Specifically, we leverage the finding that the downstream intron can tolerate large inserts without affecting splicing to achieve tandem expression of backspliced circRNAs and tRNA intronic circRNAs from the same template. Further, truncation of selected intronic regions markedly increased circRNA formation in different cell types in vitro as well as AAV-mediated circRNA expression in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissue in vivo. We also observed that different IRES elements and exon length influenced circRNA expression and translation, revealing an exonic contribution to splicing, as evidenced by different RNA species produced. Taken together, these data provide new insight into improving the design and expression of synthetic circRNAs. When combined with AAV capsid and promoter technologies, the backsplicing introns and IRES elements constituting this modular platform significantly expand the gene expression toolkit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据