4.2 Review

Conduction Mechanism of Charge Carriers in Electrodes and Design Factors for the Improvement of Charge Conduction in Li-ion Batteries

期刊

出版社

KOREAN ELECTROCHEMISTRY SOC
DOI: 10.33961/jecst.2020.01564

关键词

Li-ion Battery; Charge Transport Mechanism; Ionic Conduction; Electron Conduction

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2019R1A2C2003731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In-depth understanding of electrode processes in lithium-ion batteries is crucial for improving battery performance, as it involves studying the conduction mechanisms of charged species and the factors affecting their transport.
In-depth knowledge of electrode processes is crucial for determining the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). In particular, the conduction mechanisms of charged species in the electrodes, such as lithium ions (Li+) and electrons, are directly correlated with the performance of the battery because the overall reaction is dependent on the charge transport behavior in the electrodes. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the different electrochemical processes occurring in electrodes in order to elucidate the charge conduction phenomenon. Thus, it is essential to conduct fundamental studies on electrochemical processes to resolve the technical challenges and issues arising during the ionic and electronic conduction. Furthermore, it is also necessary to understand the transport of charged species as well as the predominant factors affecting their transport in electrodes. Based on such in-depth studies, potential approaches can be introduced to enhance the mobility of charged entities, thereby achieving superior battery performances. A clear understanding of the conduction mechanism inside electrodes can help overcome challenges associated with the rapid movement of charged species and provide a practical guideline for the development of advanced materials suitable for high-performance LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据