4.5 Review

Recent Advances in Aqueous Zinc-ion Hybrid Capacitors: A Minireview

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 484-491

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.202001322

关键词

zinc-ion hybrid capacitors; cathode materials; anode materials; electrolytes; capacitance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52003188]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2020043448]
  3. Suzhou Key Laboratory for Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper summarizes the research history, structure design, charge storage mechanisms, and electrochemical properties of zinc-ion hybrid capacitors, highlighting the challenges they face and future trends in the field. Insights gained from challenges related to electrodes and electrolyte systems could benefit other aqueous electrolyte-based electrochemical charge storage systems.
The tremendous demand for wearable electronic systems drives increasing efforts devoted to research on portable electrochemical energy storage devices. Thanks to the environmental benignity, highly intrinsic safety and low cost, zinc-ion based charge storage systems have attracted extensive attention recently. Zinc-ion hybrid capacitors (ZHCs) stand for the electrochemical energy storage system with a capacitive electrode as cathode and a zinc metal as the anode. In this minireview, we summarize the history of aqueous ZHCs and present a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in the structure design, charge storage mechanisms and electrochemical properties of the cathode, anode, as well as the electrolytes and their effects on the electrochemical performance of final ZHCs. In the end, the current challenges and our perspectives on the future trends of this field are also briefly anticipated. The pertinent insights into the challenges on the electrodes and electrolyte systems could also shed some lights on other aqueous electrolyte based electrochemical charge storage systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据