4.6 Review

Reversed Proteolysis-Proteases as Peptide Ligases

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11010033

关键词

protease catalysis; peptide bond synthesis; natural ligases

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  2. D-A-CH [I 3877-B21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteases with ligase activity have shown efficiency in in vitro peptide synthesis, with control over thermodynamic equilibrium. By manipulating acyl intermediates with specific proteases, aminolysis can be favored over hydrolysis. Engineered enzymes like Subtiligase and Trypsiligase have potential in linking peptides and proteins.
Historically, ligase activity by proteases was theoretically derived due to their catalyst nature, and it was experimentally observed as early as around 1900. Initially, the digestive proteases, such as pepsin, chymotrypsin, and trypsin were employed to perform in vitro syntheses of small peptides. Protease-catalyzed ligation is more efficient than peptide bond hydrolysis in organic solvents, representing control of the thermodynamic equilibrium. Peptide esters readily form acyl intermediates with serine and cysteine proteases, followed by peptide bond synthesis at the N-terminus of another residue. This type of reaction is under kinetic control, favoring aminolysis over hydrolysis. Although only a few natural peptide ligases are known, such as ubiquitin ligases, sortases, and legumains, the principle of proteases as general catalysts could be adapted to engineer some proteases accordingly. In particular, the serine proteases subtilisin and trypsin were converted to efficient ligases, which are known as subtiligase and trypsiligase. Together with sortases and legumains, they turned out to be very useful in linking peptides and proteins with a great variety of molecules, including biomarkers, sugars or building blocks with non-natural amino acids. Thus, these engineered enzymes are a promising branch for academic research and for pharmaceutical progress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据