4.8 Article

Charge-driven condensation of RNA and proteins suggests broad role of phase separation cytoplasmic environments

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64004

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM126948]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB 1817307, MCB 2018296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase separation processes, driven by electrostatic complementarity, have been shown to occur between RNA and positively charged proteins, suggesting a more general organizing principle for biological macromolecules in cellular environments. The resulting condensates retain internal dynamics and may occur widely in heterogeneous cellular environments between nucleic acid and protein components, without requiring polymer properties.
Phase separation processes are increasingly being recognized as important organizing mechanisms of biological macromolecules in cellular environments. Well-established drivers of phase separation are multi-valency and intrinsic disorder. Here, we show that globular macromolecules may condense simply based on electrostatic complementarity. More specifically, phase separation of mixtures between RNA and positively charged proteins is described from a combination of multiscale computer simulations with microscopy and spectroscopy experiments. Phase diagrams were mapped out as a function of molecular concentrations in experiment and as a function of molecular size and temperature via simulations. The resulting condensates were found to retain at least some degree of internal dynamics varying as a function of the molecular composition. The results suggest a more general principle for phase separation that is based primarily on electrostatic complementarity without invoking polymer properties as in most previous studies. Simulation results furthermore suggest that such phase separation may occur widely in heterogenous cellular environment between nucleic acid and protein components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据