4.7 Article

Two-stage bioprocess for hyper-production of lutein from microalga Chlorella sorokiniana FZU60: Effects of temperature, light intensity, and operation strategies

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2020.102119

关键词

Chlorella sorokiniana; Lutein; Environmental conditions; Fed-batch strategy; Two-stage strategy

资金

  1. Demonstration Project for Innovative Development of Fuzhou's Marine Economy during the 13th Five-Year Plan, China [FZHJ15, FZHJ04]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China [2020J01484]
  3. Special Foundation for Yong Scientists of Fuzhou University, China [GXRC-18061]
  4. Fuzhou Administration of Science and Technology, China [2019-G-43]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lutein is a metabolite produced by plants or microalgae, and offers various health benefits. Chlorella sorokiniana FZU60 is considered a hyper-lutein producing microalga. In this study, the effects of temperature and light intensity on cell growth and lutein accumulation by FZU60 under mixotrophic conditions were investigated. Maximal lutein productivity and production were obtained at 33 degrees C, and high light intensity enhanced cell concentration but decreased lutein content when nitrate was replete. Further, two fed-batch strategies with gradient (fed-batch strategy I) or constant (fed-batch strategy II) NaAc feeding concentrations were compared. Results showed that the second strategy was more desirable for lutein production. Moreover, two types of mixotrophy/photoautotrophy two-stage strategies with a light intensity of 750 mu mol/m(2)/s (two-stage strategy I) or 150 mu mol/m(2)/s (two-stage strategy II) in stage 2 were explored. Under the two-stage strategy I, high lutein content (11.22 mg/g), productivity (8.25 mg/L/d), and production (65.96 mg/L) were achieved. The lutein content, productivity, and production obtained in this study are higher than those reported in most related studies, indicating that the proposed strategy can be used in commercial production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据