4.6 Article

Highly Stable CsPbX3/PbSO4 Core/Shell Nanocrystals Synthesized by a Simple Post-Treatment Strategy

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202001763

关键词

core; shell heterostructures; CsPbX; (3); high stability; PbSO; (4); perovskite nanocrystals; post‐ treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673150, 21703146, 51922073]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180097]
  3. 111 Project
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_2657]
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science Technology (NANO-CIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple and effective post-treatment strategy to encapsulate CsPbX3 NC with PbSO4 nanoshell, significantly enhancing optical properties and demonstrating good stability.
All-inorganic lead halide perovskite (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I, or their mixture) nanocrystals (NCs) have recently emerged as a promising photoelectric material; however, developing highly stable CsPbX3 NCs still remains a challenge due to their intrinsic ionic nature. This work presents a simple and facile post-treatment strategy to encapsulate CsPbX3 NC with PbSO4 nanoshell at single-particle level. Compared to pristine CsPbX3 NCs, the as-prepared CsPbX3/PbSO4 NCs exhibit significant enhancement in the optical properties. Benefiting from the efficient protection of inert PbSO4 nanoshell, the obtained CsPbX3/PbSO4 core/shell NCs demonstrate great stability against polar solvents, including ethanol and acetone, and light irradiation. Furthermore, anion-exchange reaction is strongly restricted upon the encapsulation of PbSO4 shell. This work provides an alternative approach for the synthesis of highly stable CsPbX3 NCs, and paves a new way for the preparation of core/shell heterostructures based on lead halide perovskite NCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据