4.7 Article

Sensing the Past: Perspectives on Collaborative Archaeology and Ground Penetrating Radar Techniques from Coastal California

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13020285

关键词

Amah Mutsun Tribal Band; indigenous archaeology; collaborative archaeology; community-based participatory research; California archaeology; indigenous stewardship

资金

  1. GoFundMe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper summarizes more than a decade of collaborative eco-archaeological research along the central coast of California, employing remote sensing and geophysical methods to assess and protect cultural resources threatened by coastal erosion, and providing data for tribal and state partners to make decisions before archaeological excavation.
This paper summarizes over a decade of collaborative eco-archaeological research along the central coast of California involving researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, tribal citizens from the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, and California Department of Parks and Recreation archaeologists. Our research employs remote sensing methods to document and assess cultural resources threatened by coastal erosion and geophysical methods to identify archaeological deposits, minimize impacts on sensitive cultural resources, and provide tribal and state collaborators with a suite of data to consider before proceeding with any form of invasive archaeological excavation. Our case study of recent eco-archaeological research developed to define the historical biogeography of threatened and endangered anadromous salmonids demonstrates how remote sensing technologies help identify dense archaeological deposits, remove barriers, and create bridges through equitable and inclusive research practices between archaeologists and the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band. These experiences have resulted in the incorporation of remote sensing techniques as a central approach of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band when conducting archaeology in their traditional territories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据