4.5 Article

Use of simulation approaches to evaluate the consequences of catch-and-release angling on the migration behaviour of adult Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 333, 期 -, 页码 43-50

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.010

关键词

Telemetry; Recreational fisheries; Sublethal effects; Angling; Simulation

类别

资金

  1. Lakselva River Owner's Association
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  3. Research Council of Norway [216416/O10]
  4. Norwegian Environmental Agency
  5. Canada Research Chairs Program
  6. NSERC
  7. OTN Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given most Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) released by anglers survive (proportion = 0.97 in this study), economically and culturally important recreational Atlantic salmon fisheries are increasingly incorporating catch-and-release. Sublethal alterations to behaviour with potential individual fitness costs are a possible consequence of catch-and-release but are difficult to measure empirically relative to uncaptured fish. To test for sublethal effects of angling on migratory movements, 39 salmon were captured by recreational anglers, externally tagged with radio transmitters, and released. Data from the annual visual drift count of spawning salmon were used to calculate the probability of spawning in each pool of the river and input into simulation models. Simulation models were used to test the hypothesis that catch-and-release did not affect the upriver movement of 30 salmon tracked to spawning grounds. Ten thousand simulation steps selected a spawning pool for each of the tagged salmon, permitting a calculation of the average expected movement by salmon for comparison to the average movement observed with telemetry. The average observed movement by the released salmon was significantly less than the average expected movement generated by all three null models, indicating a sublethal effect of catch-and-release on the migration of Atlantic salmon. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据