4.6 Article

Optimal tuning of weighted kNN- and diffusion-based methods for denoising single cell genomics data

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008569

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [NIH R01HD096770]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [NSF IOS-1546218, NSF CBET-1728858, NIH R01 CA240283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates denoising methods for single-cell data to optimally preserve biologically relevant informative variance. DEWaKSS, a novel method utilizing self-supervised learning principles, demonstrates robust performance compared to existing complex algorithms and state-of-the-art graph denoising methods.
The analysis of single-cell genomics data presents several statistical challenges, and extensive efforts have been made to produce methods for the analysis of this data that impute missing values, address sampling issues and quantify and correct for noise. In spite of such efforts, no consensus on best practices has been established and all current approaches vary substantially based on the available data and empirical tests. The k-Nearest Neighbor Graph (kNN-G) is often used to infer the identities of, and relationships between, cells and is the basis of many widely used dimensionality-reduction and projection methods. The kNN-G has also been the basis for imputation methods using, e.g., neighbor averaging and graph diffusion. However, due to the lack of an agreed-upon optimal objective function for choosing hyperparameters, these methods tend to oversmooth data, thereby resulting in a loss of information with regard to cell identity and the specific gene-to-gene patterns underlying regulatory mechanisms. In this paper, we investigate the tuning of kNN- and diffusion-based denoising methods with a novel non-stochastic method for optimally preserving biologically relevant informative variance in single-cell data. The framework, Denoising Expression data with a Weighted Affinity Kernel and Self-Supervision (DEWaKSS), uses a self-supervised technique to tune its parameters. We demonstrate that denoising with optimal parameters selected by our objective function (i) is robust to preprocessing methods using data from established benchmarks, (ii) disentangles cellular identity and maintains robust clusters over dimension-reduction methods, (iii) maintains variance along several expression dimensions, unlike previous heuristic-based methods that tend to oversmooth data variance, and (iv) rarely involves diffusion but rather uses a fixed weighted kNN graph for denoising. Together, these findings provide a new understanding of kNN- and diffusion-based denoising methods. Code and example data for DEWaKSS is available at . Author Summary Single cell sequencing produces gene expression data which has many individual observations, but each individual cell is noisy and sparsely sampled. Existing denoising and imputation methods are of varying complexity, and it is difficult to determine if an output is optimally denoised. There are often no general criteria by which to choose model hyperparameters and users may need to supply unknown parameters such as noise distributions. Neighbor graphs are common in single cell expression analysis pipelines and are frequently used in denoising applications. Data is averaged within a connected neighborhood of the k-nearest neighbors for each observation to reduce noise. Denoising without a clear objective criteria can result in data with too much averaging and where biological information is lost. Many existing methods lack such an objective criteria and tend to overly smooth data. We have developed and evaluated an objective function that can be reliably minimized for optimally denoising single cell data on a graph, DEWaKSS. The DEWaKSS objective function is derived from self supervised learning principles and requires optimization over only a few parameters. DEWaKSS performs robustly compared to more complex algorithms and state of the art graph denoising methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据