4.5 Article

Perceived Risk and Mental Health Problems among Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Mediating Effects of Resilience and Coronavirus Fear

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00424-8

关键词

COVID-19; Mental health problems; COVID-19 perceived risk; Resilience; COVID-19 fear; Healthcare professionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the mental health problems among healthcare professionals during the pandemic and found that perceived risk and coronavirus fear increased the likelihood of depression, anxiety, and stress, while resilience helped reduce these mental health issues. Coronavirus fear mediated the relationship between perceived risk and mental health problems, and resilience mitigated the effect of coronavirus fear on mental health problems.
During coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare professionals were particularly at high-risk of developing symptoms of mental health problems due to being on the frontline in the battle against COVID-19. This study examined the mediating roles of resilience and coronavirus fear in the relationship between perceived risk and mental health problems among healthcare professionals including doctors and nurses who were actively treating patients confirmed with COVID-19. We recruited 204 healthcare professionals (50% females) with a mean age of 32.92 years (SD = 7.01). Results showed that perceived risk and coronavirus fear positively predicted depression, anxiety, and stress while resilience negatively predicted those mental health problems. Coronavirus fear mediated the relationship between perceived risk and resilience, depression, anxiety, and stress. Additionally, resilience mitigated the effect of coronavirus fear on depression, anxiety, and stress. This study is among the first indicating the importance of resilience and fear as a critical mechanism that explains the relationship between perceived risk and mental health problems among health professionals directly caring for COVID-19 patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据