4.6 Article

Screening native microalgal consortia for biomass production and nutrient removal from rural wastewaters for bioenergy applications

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 221-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.056

关键词

Livestock; Phycoremediation; Theoretical methane potential (TMP); Biodiesel; Biogas

资金

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy India, Govt. of India [19-8/2011-RD/BE]
  2. CSIR SRF fellowship [09/086/(1222)/2015-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, 9 native microalgae consortia were investigated for their biomass potential in both low strength rural sector wastewater, RSW (COD = 310.46 mg L-1; NO3-N = 9.8 mg L-1; TDP = 26.89 mg L-1; TAN = 10.1 mg L-1) and high strength livestock wastewater, LSW (COD = 2940 mg L-1; NO3-N = 75 mg L-1; TDP = 200 mg L-1; TAN = 161 mg L-1). In LSW, maximum biomass concentration of 1.93 g DW L-1 was recorded which was significantly higher than that in standard synthetic media BG11 (1.17 g DW L-1) and RSW (0.78 gDW L-1). By the end of 12 day batch culture, all the native consortia showed 80-100% reduction in nutrient from the tested wastewaters under controlled conditions (temperature: 25 +/- 1 degrees C, light intensity: 50-60 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) and dark -light cycle of 12:12 h). Comparative growth of algae in RSW and LSW suggest that different types of wastewater could result in different nutrient removal kinetics and growth potential of algae. The biochemical characterization of the best performing consortium, PA6 (C0.5H7.8O0.5N0.7) revealed that it was rich in protein (54%) followed by lipids (31%) and carbohydrates (10%). The estimation of theoretical methane potential (0.79 m(-3) kgVS(-1)) suggested that PA6 has better prospects of biogas generation. Hence, this particular consortium could be utilized for reducing the water pollution levels and generating feedstock for biofuels production. However, challenges associated with scale up and continuous operation under real conditions need to be evaluated and addressed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据