4.7 Article

Endocrine-Disrupting Organochlorine Pesticides in Human Breast Milk: Changes during Lactation

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13010229

关键词

human breast milk; OCPs; infant health; lactation; endocrine disrupting pesticides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study assessed the safety of infants related to endocrine-disrupting organochlorine pesticides (OCP) in breast milk. It was found that certain dietary habits of pregnant mothers could affect the levels of OCP compounds in breast milk. The consumption of specific food products, such as pork, beef, poultry, eggs, and dairy, was linked to increased pesticide residues in breast milk.
The aim of the present study was to assess infant safety associated with the occurrence of endocrine-disrupting organochlorine pesticides (OCP) in breast milk. Moreover, the association between pregnant mothers' dietary habits and these compounds levels in breast milk was investigated. Breast milk was collected at various stages of lactation. The samples were analyzed by the GC-MS method. The OCP concentrations ranged from < limit of detection (LOD) to 6.81 ng/g lipids. The highest OCP concentrations in breast milk occurred primarily within the first month of lactation, and decreased over the lactation period. It was found that the maternal consumption of certain food products-in particular pork, beef, poultry, eggs, and dairy products-could have affected the content of 1,1'-(2,2,2-Trichloroethane-1,1-diyl)bis(4-chlorobenzene), called DDT and its metabolites in the breast milk. The levels of beta-endosulfan were positively correlated with fish and poultry consumption. The redundancy analysis indicated that the diets of the pregnant women had an important impact on pesticide residues in the breast milk. There is a potential possibility of lowering the content of organochlorine compounds in breast milk by adhering to nutritional recommendations, e.g., avoiding the excessive consumption of fish and other raw food materials of unknown origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据