4.6 Article

Comparative evaluation of influencing factors on aquaculture wastewater treatment by various constructed wetlands

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 221-225

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.029

关键词

constructed wetland; multivariate analyses; influencing factors; wetland performance; nitrification-denitrification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31202034, 31400435]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [WUT: 163106004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFB596]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a long-term observation on fifteen different constructed wetlands covering diverse scales, flow regimes, substrates, plants and operating conditions was obtained and their performance was comparatively assessed by multivariate analyses. The fifteen wetlands were sorted into five categories: i.e. two conventional horizontal flows (CHF), three narrow horizontal flows (NHF), one surface flow (SF), nine submersed vertical flows (SVF) or non-submersed vertical flows (NVF). Results of stepwise regression showed significant linear relationships existed between the various k and measured environment with the latter displaying different impacts on k among all the systems. The significant linear relationships were also evidenced by redundancy analysis (RDA), which demonstrated the existence of multicollinearity among certain influencing factors. Further, variation partitioning revealed that the wetland performance (defined in this study) was mainly affected by structural and operational characteristics, which were also the determinants of redox conditions within subsurface flows. For nitrogen (N) removal, factors which were strongly related to nitrification-denitrification were more closely related to performance compared to other influences for the present systems operated under the specific running conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据