4.8 Article

Demonstration of non-Markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20113-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  3. Laby Foundation grant at The University of Melbourne
  4. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT160100073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the scale-up of quantum computers, the framework underpinning fault-tolerance generally relies on the strong assumption that environmental noise affecting qubit logic is uncorrelated (Markovian). However, as physical devices progress well into the complex multi-qubit regime, attention is turning to understanding the appearance and mitigation of correlated - or non-Markovian - noise, which poses a serious challenge to the progression of quantum technology. This error type has previously remained elusive to characterisation techniques. Here, we develop a framework for characterising non-Markovian dynamics in quantum systems and experimentally test it on multi-qubit superconducting quantum devices. Where noisy processes cannot be accounted for using standard Markovian techniques, our reconstruction predicts the behaviour of the devices with an infidelity of 10(-3). Our results show this characterisation technique leads to superior quantum control and extension of coherence time by effective decoupling from the non-Markovian environment. This framework, validated by our results, is applicable to any controlled quantum device and offers a significant step towards optimal device operation and noise reduction. As quantum computing devices become more complex, they enter the realm of correlated noise, which is difficult to characterise and mitigate. Here, the authors demonstrate, over a range of superconducting devices, a method for non-Markovian dynamics characterisation based on the process tensor framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据