4.6 Review

Evasion of the Cell-Mediated Immune Response by Alphaherpesviruses

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v12121354

关键词

alphaherpesvirus; adaptive immune response; herpesviral evasion

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  3. grants for the International Joint Research Project of the Institute of Medical Science
  4. University of Tokyo from the MEXT
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Mitsubishi Foundation
  7. Uehara Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alphaherpesviruses cause various diseases and establish life-long latent infections in humans and animals. These viruses encode multiple viral proteins and miRNAs to evade the host immune response, including both innate and adaptive immunity. Alphaherpesviruses evolved highly advanced immune evasion strategies to be able to replicate efficiently in vivo and produce latent infections with recurrent outbreaks. This review describes the immune evasion strategies of alphaherpesviruses, especially against cytotoxic host immune responses. Considering these strategies, it is important to evaluate whether the immune evasion mechanisms in cell cultures are applicable to viral propagation and pathogenicity in vivo. This review focuses on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), natural killer cells (NK cells), and natural killer T cells (NKT cells), which are representative immune cells that directly damage virus-infected cells. Since these immune cells recognize the ligands expressed on their target cells via specific activating and/or inhibitory receptors, alphaherpesviruses make several ligands that may be targets for immune evasion. In addition, alphaherpesviruses suppress the infiltration of CTLs by downregulating the expression of chemokines at infection sites in vivo. Elucidation of the alphaherpesvirus immune evasion mechanisms is essential for the development of new antiviral therapies and vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据