4.1 Article

C57BL/6J mouse superovulation: schedule and age optimization to increase oocyte yield and reduce animal use

期刊

ZYGOTE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 199-203

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0967199420000714

关键词

Age; C57BL/6J; Estrous cycle; Schedule; Superovulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to optimize a superovulation protocol in mice, and found that for C57BL/6J mice, hormones should be administered at 3 or 7 pm for 3-week-old females, while older females should be superovulated at 7 pm to increase oocyte production per female and reduce the use of mice.
Superovulation protocols have been described for different mouse strains, however the numbers of animals used are still high and still little information is known about hormone administration schedules and estrous cycle phases. In this study, we aimed to optimize a superovulation protocol by injecting 5 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin followed by 5 IU of hCG 48 h later, using three different schedules related to the beginning of the dark cycle (3, 5 and 7 pm) in a light cycle of 7 amto 7 pm, with light on at 7 am. C57BL/6J mice at 3, 4 and 5 weeks of age were used and the estrous cycle phase for times of PMSG and hCG injections was also analyzed. Total oocyte number was counted in the morning after hCG injection. Hormones given at 3 weeks of age at 3 pm(59 +/- 15 oocytes) and 7 pm(61 +/- 10 oocytes) produced a significantly higher oocyte number compared with oocytes numbers collected from females at the same age at 5 pm (P = 0.0004 and <0.0001 respectively). Females at 4 and 5 weeks of age produced higher numbers of oocytes when superovulated at 7 pm. No statistical differences between females at different phases of the estrous cycle were found. These results showed that in C57BL/6J mice, hormones should be given at 3 or 7 pm for females at 3 weeks of age, however older females should be superovulated closer to the beginning of the dark cycle to reduce female mouse use and increase the numbers of oocytes produced per female.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据