4.2 Article

Individual Differences in Response to Supervised Exercise Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease

期刊

WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 770-784

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0193945920977479

关键词

peripheral artery disease; exercise; trainability; older adults

类别

资金

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation
  2. Midwest Nursing Research Society
  3. National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), NIH under a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [F31NR016614]
  4. National Institute of Aging (NIA), NIH [T32AG000279]
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), NIH [UL1TR002494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that in older adults undergoing 12 weeks of supervised exercise therapy for peripheral artery disease, about one-third showed nonresponse to exercise, while over four in ten exhibited poor response. Most participants improved in at least one aspect, but only a small number improved in all measured outcomes.
Nonresponse to exercise has been extensively examined in young athletes but is seldom reported in studies of aerobic exercise interventions in older adults. This study examined the prevalence of nonresponse and poor response to exercise in functional and quality of life outcomes and response patterns between and among older adults undergoing 12-weeks of supervised exercise therapy for the management of peripheral artery disease (N = 44, mean age 72.3 years, 47.7% female). The prevalence of nonresponse (no change/decline in performance) in walking distance was 31.8%. The prevalence of poor response (lack of a clinically meaningful improvement) was 43.2%. Similar patterns of response were observed in both objective and patient-reported measures of physical function. All participants improved in at least one outcome; only two participants improved in all measured outcomes. Additional research should examine modifiable predictors of response to inform programming and maximize an individual's potential benefit from exercise therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据