4.7 Review

Asteriacites von Schlotheim, 1820-the oldest valid ichnogenus name - and other asterozoan-produced trace fossils

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 111-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.003

关键词

Asteriacites; Asteriacitidae; Biformitidae; Asteroidea; Ophiuroidea; Trace fossil; Ichnology; Ichnotaxonomy; New ichnotaxa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ichnogenus Asteriacites von Schlotheim, 1820 results from the resting activity of sea stars (Asteroidea) and brittle stars (Ophiuroidea) and is a common cosmopolitan trace fossil recorded from the Cambrian to the Quaternary. Its taxonomic validity has recently been challenged because of the lack of type material, but newly discovered specimens from the von Schlotheim collection in the Natural History Museum (Museum fur Naturkunde) of Berlin justify the validity of this ichnotaxon and thus make it the oldest valid ichnogenus name. The ichnofamily Asteriacitidae nov. is established for radial imprints and shallowly excavated pits and contains the ichnogenera Asteriacites (type ichnogenus), Asterichnites Brown and Vokes, 1944, and Ichnocumulus Seilacher, 1956. Basic morphology is regarded as the main ichnotaxobase for distinction of ichnogenera, while overall morphology in combination with morphometry (e.g. length/width ratio of arm imprints) aids the distinction of ichnospecies. Consequently, three Asteriacites ichnospecies can be differentiated, which are (with decreasing length/width ratio of their arm imprints) A. lumbricalis von Schlotheim, 1820; A. stelliformis (Miller and Dyer, 1878) Osgood, 1970; and A, quinquefolius (Quenstedt, 1876) Seilacher, 1953. Moreover, arcuate or hook-shaped imprints occurring isolated or clustered (e.g. trackways) are assigned to the ichnofamily Biformitidae nov., containing Biformites Linck, 1949 (type ichnogenus); Arcichnus Sutcliffe, 1997; and Harpichnus Vallon et al., 2015 (produced by moulting of arthropods). Burrows attributed to asterozoan activity are briefly mentioned. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据