4.8 Article

Plasmonic Titanium Nitride Facilitates Indium Oxide CO2 Photocatalysis

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 49, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202005754

关键词

CO; (2) photocatalysis; indium oxide; photothermal; plasmon resonance; titanium nitride

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI)
  2. Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure (MEDI)
  3. Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change's (MOECC) Best in Science (BIS) Award
  4. Ontario Center of Excellence Solutions 2030 Challenge Fund
  5. Ministry of Research Innovation and Science (MRIS) Low Carbon Innovation Fund (LCIF), Imperial Oil
  6. University of Toronto's Connaught Innovation Fund (CIF)
  7. Connaught Global Challenge (CGC) Fund
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872081]
  10. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016BM04]
  11. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572011, 2017T100494]
  12. NSERC PDF fund
  13. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoscale titanium nitride TiN is a metallic material that can effectively harvest sunlight over a broad spectral range and produce high local temperatures via the photothermal effect. Nanoscale indium oxide-hydroxide, In2O3-x(OH)(y), is a semiconducting material capable of photocatalyzing the hydrogenation of gaseous CO2; however, its wide electronic bandgap limits its absorption of photons to the ultraviolet region of the solar spectrum. Herein, the benefits of both nanomaterials in a ternary heterostructure: TiN@TiO2@In2O3-x(OH)(y) are combined. This heterostructured material synergistically couples the metallic TiN and semiconducting In2O3-x(OH)(y) phases via an interfacial semiconducting TiO2 layer, allowing it to drive the light-assisted reverse water gas shift reaction at a conversion rate greatly surpassing that of its individual components or any binary combinations thereof.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据