4.5 Article

Weak Signal-Oriented Investigation of Ethical Dissonance Applied to Unsuccessful Mobility Experiences Linked to Human-Machine Interactions

期刊

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00284-y

关键词

Weak signals; Ethical dissonance; Human-systems inclusion; Systems engineering; Ethical factors

资金

  1. Scientific Research Network on Integrated Automation and Human-Machine Systems (GRAISyHM)
  2. Regional Council of Hauts-de-France (Regional Council of Nord - Pas de Calais - Picardie from France), project CONPETISES (Pedagogical control of human driving tasks by automated systems)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a weak signal-oriented framework to investigate ethical dissonance through human-machine interactions. The framework extracts weak signal-based scenarios from individual experiences and evaluates them, aiming to help system-inclusive design processes. Investigating ethical dissonance can aid in understanding and addressing conflicts between beliefs or behaviors.
Ethical dissonance arises from conflicts between beliefs or behaviors and affects ethical factors such as normality or conformity. This paper proposes a weak signal-oriented framework to investigate ethical dissonance from experiences linked to human-machine interactions. It is based on a systems engineering principle called human-systems inclusion, which considers any experience feedback of weak signals as beneficial to learn. The framework studies weak signal-based scenarios from testimonies of individual experiences and these scenarios are assessed by other people. For this purpose, the framework proposes several databases as sources of weak signals, formalization tools of experience feedback of weak signals, models of references of conformity, ethical factors, and a list of examples of ethical dissonance. It also includes sequential steps to make the latter credible regarding the results from the experimental protocols. The framework was used to investigate ethical dissonance by analyzing experiences pertaining to achieving inclusive mobility. The first example focuses on ethical dissonance in terms of hindrance that goes against autonomous mobility due to a misunderstanding of how the system functions in terms of negative and positive emotions. Two other examples present possible ethical dissonance when the use of safety systems such as car driver-assistance systems, may create danger. Investigating ethical dissonance can then help system-inclusive design or evaluation processes by taking into account scenarios from weak signal-based experiences and making them credible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据