4.2 Article

Causes and implications of Mid- to Late Holocene relative sea-level change in the Gulf of Kachchh, western India

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 98-121

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/qua.2020.86

关键词

Relative sea-level change; Intertidal deposits; Gulf of Kachchh; Mid- to Late Holocene; Indian Summer Monsoon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relict intertidal deposits from the Kharod River Estuary, Gulf of Kachchh, and the distal end of Kori Creek were used to infer the Mid- to Late Holocene relative sea-level change in western India. The study suggests that the Mid-Holocene RSL high was mainly influenced by meltwater contribution from the Himalayan cryosphere, while the Late Holocene RSL change could be attributed to monsoon wind-driven tidal ingression.
The relict intertidal deposits from the Kharod River Estuary, Gulf of Kachchh, and the distal end of Kori Creek are used to infer the Mid- to Late Holocene relative sea-level (RSL) change in western India. Employing sedimentology, geochemistry, palynology, ichnology, and optical and radiocarbon dating, the study suggests the dominance of fluvial activity between 16.5 +/- 1.6 and 9.9 +/- 0.7 ka. After similar to 7 ka (7.3 +/- 0.4, 6.8 +/- 0.5 ka), the sea level showed a positive tendency until 4.7 +/- 0.2 ka. The tectonically corrected Mid-Holocene RSL change is estimated as 1.45 +/- 0.33 m between similar to 7 and similar to 5 ka. The study suggests that the Mid-Holocene RSL high was due to the meltwater contribution from the Himalayan cryosphere, with subordinate contribution from glacio-isostatic adjustment and crustal subsidence. The Late Holocene tectonically corrected RSL change at similar to 1 ka (1.1 +/- 0.1 ka and 1045 +/- 175 cal yr BP) is estimated as 0.53 +/- 0.43 m. This is ascribed to monsoon wind-driven tidal ingression that might have affected the tidal amplitude positively. The study suggests that the Mid-Holocene RSL change did not play a deterministic role in the abandonment of the Harappan coastal settlements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据