4.7 Article

A dynamic and simulation-based method for quantitative risk assessment of the domino accident in chemical industry

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.014

关键词

Domino accident; Monte Carlo simulation; Synergic effects; Chemical industry

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [71725006]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0802801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A domino accident is a typical multi-hazard coupling disaster in the chemical industry that often has serious consequences and social impact. The quantitative risk assessment of domino accidents faces several difficulties caused by their complexity, unpredictability, and synergic effects. This paper proposes a new method for quantitative risk assessment of domino accidents in the chemical industry based on field theory and Monte Carlo simulation. The method is intended to obtain the dynamic distribution of the individual risk caused by the domino accident. Monte Carlo simulation is used to account for all accident scenarios and to calculate the average risk distribution. The application of field theory enables the consideration of the synergic effects. To evaluate the efficacy of the assessment method, a typical domino scenario in a chemical plant in Yancheng, China, is taken as a case study. The results show that domino accidents consist of three stages: rapid development stage, stabilization stage, and weakening stage. The risks of fire, explosion, and toxic releases also have different distribution characteristics: flat, peak, and slope. The results also show that the risk of domino accidents increases due to the synergic effects of physical effects and human vulnerability. The new risk assessment method can provide guidance for the prevention, mitigation, and risk management of domino accidents in the chemical industry. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据