4.8 Article

Charge Density Waves in YBa2Cu3O6.67 Probed by Resonant X-Ray Scattering under Uniaxial Compression

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.037002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regione Lombardia under project ERC-P-ReXS [2016-0790]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [422213 477-TRR288]
  3. Fondazione CARIPLO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the changes in 2D and 3D incommensurate charge correlations in high-temperature superconductors, revealing a strong in-plane anisotropy of charge correlations and the symmetric response to pressure in different directions. The results suggest a uniaxial order parameter and show that 3D charge order is only observed along one direction in response to specific compression, which may be a generic feature of cuprates. The implications of these findings for electronic nematicity models and the interplay between charge order and superconductivity are discussed.
We report a comprehensive Cu L-3-edge resonant x-ray scattering (RXS) study of two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) incommensurate charge correlations in single crystals of the underdoped high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O6.67 under uniaxial compression up to 1% along the two inequivalent Cu-O-Cu bond directions (a and b) in the CuO2 planes. We confirm the strong in-plane anisotropy of the 2D charge correlations and observe their symmetric response to pressure: pressure along a enhances correlations along b, and vice versa. Our results imply that the underlying order parameter is uniaxial. In contrast, 3D long-range charge order is only observed along b in response to compression along a. Spectroscopic RXS measurements show that the 3D charge order resides exclusively in the CuO2 planes and may thus be generic to the cuprates. We discuss implications of these results for models of electronic nematicity and for the interplay between charge order and superconductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据