4.4 Article

A longitudinal study of cotinine in long-term daily users of e-cigarettes

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 218-221

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.003

关键词

Nicotine; Tobacco; Cotinine; Electronic-cigarette; E-cigarette

资金

  1. Swiss Tobacco prevention Fund [12.000189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is not clear whether, in established vapers, cotinine levels remain stable or change over time. Methods: We enrolled 98 exclusive users of e-cigarettes on websites and forums dedicated to smoking cessation and to e-cigarettes. We collected saliva vials by mail in 2013-2014 (baseline), and collected a second saliva vial eight months later (follow-up) in the same participants. Participants had not used any tobacco or nicotine medications in the previous five days. Cotinine in saliva was analyzed with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Use of e-cigarettes, tobacco and nicotine medications was self-reported. Results: All participants were former smokers, and 99% were using e-cigarettes daily. They had already been using e-cigarettes for nine months on average at baseline. The median cotinine level was 252 ng/mL at baseline (quartiles: 124-421 ng/mL) and 307 ng/mL at follow-up (114-466 ng/mL, W=0.9, p=0.4 for change over time). The median concentration of nicotine in refill liquids was 11 mg/mL at baseline (quartiles: 6-15 mg/mL) and 6 mg/mL at follow-up (5-12 mg/mL) (Wilcoxon signed rank test: W=5.2, p < 0.001 for change over time). The median volume of e-liquid used per month was 80 mL at baseline (quartiles: 50-130 mL) and 100 mL at follow-up (60-157 mL, W=3.3, p=0.001 for change over time). Conclusion: In experienced e-cigarette users enrolled online, cotinine levels were similar to levels usually observed in cigarette smokers. Over time, these users decreased the concentration of nicotine in their e-liquids, but increased their consumption of e-liquid in order to maintain their cotinine levels constant. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据