4.6 Article

Tuning transmission properties of 3D printed metal rod arrays by breaking the structural symmetry

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 538-551

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.397474

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Shanghai Normal University [SK202010]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [20PJ1412200]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17142200100, 18590780100, 19590746000]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-02-E00032]
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K17525]
  6. China Scholarship Council [201606890003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally and numerically demonstrates a metallic photonic crystal waveguide composed of periodic metal rod arrays in terahertz frequencies, showing different resonant modes characteristics and their sensitivity to structural parameter changes.
In this work, one metallic photonic crystal waveguide composed of periodic metal rod arrays (MRAs) is experimentally and numerically demonstrated in terahertz frequencies. Such waveguides fabricated by 3D printers exhibit two resonant modes: the fundamental mode and the high-order mode, separating by a broad bandgap. Compared to the fundamental mode, the high-order mode shows higher field confinement and more sensitive to the geometry changes. By breaking the structure parameter, i.e., increasing or decreasing the metal rod interspace, the spectral positions, bandwidths, as well as the transmittances of high-order modes can be optimized. With broken symmetry in MRAs, the third resonant mode having high transmittance has emerged in the transmission spectrum. Results showing that fine-tuning in the alignment of metal rods leads to a great change in the transmission of high-order modes. These findings suggest that the transportation efficiency of THz waves through an MRA is tunable by breaking the structural symmetry. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据