4.8 Article

Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 384, 期 3, 页码 216-228

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028220

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [089725/B/09/Z]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [IPR-119993]
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada [000448]
  4. Population Health Research Institute
  5. Hamilton Health Sciences Research Institute
  6. St. John's Research Institute
  7. Cadila Pharmaceuticals
  8. Philippine Council for Health Research and Development
  9. Secretaria de Salud del Departamento de Santander, Colombia
  10. Wellcome Trust [089725/B/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study showed that combined treatment with a polypill plus aspirin reduced cardiovascular events among participants without cardiovascular disease but at intermediate cardiovascular risk. However, the polypill alone or aspirin alone did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events. Participants in the polypill group had a higher incidence of hypotension or dizziness compared to the placebo group.
BACKGROUND A polypill comprising statins, multiple blood-pressure-lowering drugs, and aspirin has been proposed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS Using a 2-by-2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned participants without cardiovascular disease who had an elevated INTEMEART Risk Score to receive a polypill (containing 40 mg of simvastatin, 100 mg of atenolol, 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide, and 10 mg of ramipril) or placebo daily, aspirin (75 mg) or placebo daily, and vitamin D or placebo monthly. We report here the outcomes for the polypill alone as compared with matching placebo, for aspirin alone as compared with matching placebo, and for the polypill plus aspirin as compared with double placebo. For the polypill-alone and polypill-plus-aspirin comparisons, the primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest, heart failure, or revascularization. For the aspirin comparison, the primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 5713 participants underwent randomization, and the mean follow-up was 4.6 years. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was lower by approximately 19 mg per deciliter and systolic blood pressure was lower by approximately 5.8 mm Hg with the polypill and with combination therapy than with placebo. The primary outcome for the polypill comparison occurred in 126 participants (4.4%) in the polypi!l group and in 157 (5.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.00). The primary outcome for the aspirin comparison occurred in 116 participants (4.1%) in the aspirin group and in 134 (4.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.10). The primary outcome for the polypill-plus-aspirin comparison occurred in 59 participants (4.1%) in the combined-treatment group and in 83 (5.8%) in the double-placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.97). The incidence of hypotension or dizziness was higher in groups that received the polypill than in their respective placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS Combined treatment with a polypill plus aspirin led to a lower incidence of cardiovascular events than did placebo among participants without cardiovascular disease who were at intermediate cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据