4.7 Review

Mutation-selection balance and compensatory mechanisms in tumour evolution

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 251-262

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-020-00299-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Physical Sciences in Oncology Program [U54CA193489]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [648670]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [648670] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intratumour heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity enabled by various somatic aberrations, epigenetic and metabolic adaptations, play a crucial role in helping cancers resist treatment and survive under environmental stress. Understanding the interplay between genetic aberrations, the microenvironment, and epigenetic and metabolic cellular states is essential for early detection, prevention, and development of efficient therapeutic strategies for cancer.
Intratumour heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity, sustained by a range of somatic aberrations, as well as epigenetic and metabolic adaptations, are the principal mechanisms that enable cancers to resist treatment and survive under environmental stress. A comprehensive picture of the interplay between different somatic aberrations, from point mutations to whole-genome duplications, in tumour initiation and progression is lacking. We posit that different genomic aberrations generally exhibit a temporal order, shaped by a balance between the levels of mutations and selective pressures. Repeat instability emerges first, followed by larger aberrations, with compensatory effects leading to robust tumour fitness maintained throughout the tumour progression. A better understanding of the interplay between genetic aberrations, the microenvironment, and epigenetic and metabolic cellular states is essential for early detection and prevention of cancer as well as development of efficient therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据