4.6 Article

One-step synthesis of blue-green luminescent carbon dots by a low-temperature rapid method and their high-performance antibacterial effect and bacterial imaging

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abd8b0

关键词

carbon dots; one-step synthesis; antibacterial activity; antibacterial mechanism; bacteria imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978329]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of South-Central University for Nationalities [CZY19029, CZP20004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a method for preparing blue-green-emitting carbon dots using glucose as the carbon source, which has been shown to exhibit inhibitory effects against various microorganisms, especially with a high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against Staphylococcus aureus.
Due to the global infection problem caused by the abuse of antibiotics, the preparation of novel antibacterial nanomaterials is a key and basic requirement for applications in antibacterial and bacterial imaging fields. This paper reports the one-step preparation of blue-green-emitting carbon dots (CDs) under low temperature (80 degrees C) with glucose as the carbon source, citric acid as the dehydrating agent, and polyethyleneimine as the nitrogen source. Through inhibition zone tests and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) experiments, the inhibitory abilities of prepared CDs against various microorganisms, including gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria and fungi, were compared. It is worth mentioning that the MIC of CDs against Staphylococcus aureus reaches 4.7 mu g ml(-1), and the CDs exhibit excellent biocompatibility. Moreover, studies on visual-treatment therapy, in which infection treatment can be performed at the same time as bacterial imaging, with the prepared functional antibacterial CDs based on fluorescence confocal imaging would be beneficial to their promising future in medical and biological fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据