4.6 Article

Spectroscopic and Antibacterial Properties of CuONPs from Orange, Lemon and Tangerine Peel Extracts: Potential for Combating Bacterial Resistance

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26030586

关键词

green synthesis; citrus peels; copper oxide nanoparticles; antibacterial activity

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa [129084]
  2. Thutuka [UID 117709]
  3. North-West University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using citrus peel extracts is environmentally friendly and non-toxic. Different solvents and citrus peel types have significant influences on the properties of the nanoparticles.
Green synthesis of nanoparticles using citrus peel extracts is known to be environmentally friendly and non-toxic when compared to chemical methods. In this study, different citrus peel extracts obtained with the solvents acetone and distilled water were used to synthesize copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs). The nanoparticles were characterized using cyclic voltammetry, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The absorption spectrum of CuONPs prepared with acetone exhibited characteristic peaks at the wavelengths between 280-293 nm, while those with distilled water had peaks at 290 nm. The acetone-synthesized CuONPs were spherical while those produced using distilled water were rod-shaped. Based on EDS, the analysis revealed a trace spectrum of CuO nanoparticles with different weight compositions that varied with the type of citrus peel and solvent used. FTIR measurements were carried out in the range of 500-4000 cm(-1) for citrus peel extract mediated CuONPs. The spectra had five vibrations occurring at approximately 473, 477, 482, 607 and 616 cm(-1) for all samples, which can be attributed to the vibrations of CuO, validating the formation of highly pure CuONPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据