4.5 Review

Computer vision for microscopic skin cancer diagnosis using handcrafted and non-handcrafted features

期刊

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
卷 84, 期 6, 页码 1272-1283

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23686

关键词

cancer; conventional versus deep learning; handcrafted versus non‐ handcrafted features; health systems; healthcare; skin melanoma

资金

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) Lab CCIS Prince Sultan University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin covers the entire body and is the largest organ. Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, is a dreadful disease primarily caused by sensitivity to ultraviolet rays. Various handcrafted and automatic deep learning features have been employed to diagnose skin cancer, with a focus on comparing techniques using different features and exploring clinical features for better detection. Parameters like jacquard index, accuracy, dice efficiency, preciseness, sensitivity, and specificity are compared on benchmark data sets to assess reported techniques.
Skin covers the entire body and is the largest organ. Skin cancer is one of the most dreadful cancers that is primarily triggered by sensitivity to ultraviolet rays from the sun. However, the riskiest is melanoma, although it starts in a few different ways. The patient is extremely unaware of recognizing skin malignant growth at the initial stage. Literature is evident that various handcrafted and automatic deep learning features are employed to diagnose skin cancer using the traditional machine and deep learning techniques. The current research presents a comparison of skin cancer diagnosis techniques using handcrafted and non-handcrafted features. Additionally, clinical features such as Menzies method, seven-point detection, asymmetry, border color and diameter, visual textures (GRC), local binary patterns, Gabor filters, random fields of Markov, fractal dimension, and an oriental histography are also explored in the process of skin cancer detection. Several parameters, such as jacquard index, accuracy, dice efficiency, preciseness, sensitivity, and specificity, are compared on benchmark data sets to assess reported techniques. Finally, publicly available skin cancer data sets are described and the remaining issues are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据