4.6 Article

Surface imaging for real-time patient respiratory function assessment in intensive care

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 142-155

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14557

关键词

Intensive Care Unit; noncontact monitoring; respiratory function; surface imaging

资金

  1. SATT Funding Source: Medline
  2. Université de Bretagne Occidentale (UBO) Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel noncontact monitoring system for continuous monitoring of key respiratory parameters for critically ill patients, enabling disease assessment. Results showed high correlation with reference methods in both mannequin and patient recordings.
Purpose Monitoring of physiological parameters is a major concern in Intensive Care Units (ICU) given their role in the assessment of vital organ function. Within this context, one issue is the lack of efficient noncontact techniques for respiratory monitoring. In this paper, we present a novel noncontact solution for real-time respiratory monitoring and function assessment of ICU patients. Methods The proposed system uses a Time-of-Flight depth sensor to analyze the patient's chest wall morphological changes in order to estimate multiple respiratory function parameters. The automatic detection of the patient's torso is also proposed using a deep neural network model trained on the COCO dataset. The evaluation of the proposed system was performed on a mannequin and on 16 mechanically ventilated patients (a total of 216 recordings) admitted in the ICU of the Brest University Hospital. Results The estimation of respiratory parameters (respiratory rate and tidal volume) showed high correlation with the reference method (r = 0.99; P P < 0.001) in the mannequin recordings and (r = 0.95, P < 0.001 and r = 0.90, P < 0.001) for patients. Conclusion This study describes and evaluates a novel noncontact monitoring system suitable for continuous monitoring of key respiratory parameters for disease assessment of critically ill patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据