4.7 Article

Microstructures and strengthening mechanisms of high Fe containing Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys with Mg, Si and Mn modified

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140477

关键词

Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys; High Fe content; Microstructures; Mechanical properties; Strengthening mechanisms

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0300901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two high Fe containing Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys were prepared and compared with a common applied alloy in terms of microstructures and mechanical properties. The alloys showed a good combination of strength and elongation, mainly due to precipitation and solid solution strengthening from appropriate proportions of Mg and Si elements.
In this paper, two high Fe containing Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys with Mg, Si and Mn modified were prepared, and their microstructures and mechanical properties were comparatively studied with a common applied alloy. Furthermore, the effects of alloying elements on their microstructures and the corresponding strengthening mechanisms were analyzed. It was found that the two Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys exhibited good combination of strength and elongation in spite of their high Fe content. When compared with the common applied alloy, the yield strength of the two alloys was increased by 28 MPa and 50 MPa respectively, whereas the elongation was only slightly decreased. The higher strength of the two Al-Mg-Si-Mn-Fe alloys was mainly attributed to precipitation and solid solution strengthening which were substantially caused by the appropriated proportion of Mg and Si. Owing to the appropriate addition of Mn, no beta-AlFeSi phases were found in the alloys, and the detriments of Fe were fully eliminated. The submicron scaled alpha-Al(FeMn)Si phases slightly improved the yield strength because of their contribution to grain refinement and dispersion strengthening. The results of this paper provide a valuable insight into the strengthening and industrial manufacturing of Al-Mg-Si alloys.Y

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据