4.7 Article

Preferential grazing and repackaging of small polyethylene microplastic particles (≤5 µm) by the ciliate Sterkiella sp.

期刊

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105260

关键词

Microplastics; Algae; Microzooplankton; Ciliates; Sterkiella; Microplastic repackaging; Polystyrene; Ingestion; Grazing

资金

  1. Government of the Principality of Monaco
  2. Swedish Government through an IAEA Peaceful Uses Initiative (PUI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that ciliates may preferentially ingest microplastics over algal food, and can repackage them into fecal pellets to introduce microplastics into different compartments of the marine food web, potentially impacting marine ecosystems.
Microplastic (MP) particles are pollutants of global concern and are ubiquitously distributed in the ocean by physical and biological processes. It has been shown that zooplankton can ingest MP yet the interaction between ciliates and MP is still poorly understood. The discrimination and preferential uptake of MP rather than algal prey by ciliates was assessed in this study. The ciliate Sterkiella sp. was fed a diet that consisted of only Isochrysis galbana or a mixture of the same algae and similarly sized polyethylene beads in a 1:3 ratio. Significant, preferential MP grazing was observed in the Plastic-Algae treatment, which is the first reported evidence of protozooplankton preferentially ingesting MP over algal food. The mixed treatment contained fecal pellets with embedded MP. Preferential uptake of MP suggests that Sterkiella sp. is capable of ingesting and then ?repackaging? MP that would otherwise be too small for larger taxa. This process would thus offer a mechanism for the reintroduction of MP into different compartments of the marine food web. As a consequence, it is necessary to account for small-sized MP (<5 ?m) particles, that may have additional and yet unknown, impacts on marine food webs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据