Conservation pest control with new technologies: public perceptions

New genetic tools can potentially mitigate the decline of biodiversity. Democratisation of science mandates public opinion be considered while new technologies are in development. We conducted eleven focus groups in New Zealand to explore three questions about novel technologies (gene drive and two others for comparison of pest control tools): (1) what are the risks/benefits? (2) how do they compare to current methods? and (3) who should be represented on a panel that evaluates the tools and what factors should they consider? Findings from the content analysis of the risks/benefits revealed three main considerations that were of social concern - Environmental, Practical, and Ethical. Most participants were self-aware of their insufficient knowledge to compare the different technologies. Unanimously, respondents wanted the available information provided throughout the tool development process and saw multi-sector panel oversight as essential. Scientists and policy makers should match the public's willingness to engage collaboratively.

Automated summary

New genetic tools have the potential to alleviate the decline of biodiversity. The democratization of science requires considering public opinion during the development of new technologies. A study conducted in New Zealand through focus groups revealed that the risks and benefits of these technologies were of social concern, particularly regarding the environment, practicality, and ethics. Participants acknowledged their lack of knowledge to compare different technologies and unanimously called for available information throughout the development process, as well as oversight from a multi-sector panel. Scientists and policymakers should actively engage with the public.