4.4 Article

Identification of brain structures and blood vessels by conventional ultrasound in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 346, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108935

关键词

Brain anatomy; Blood flow; Rat; Transcranial; Ultrasound

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health-Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) [FIS PI16/01052]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER Funding) [CP15/00069, FI17/00188, FI18/00026]
  3. INVICTUS PLUS Spanish Network of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) [RD16/0019/0005]
  4. Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral fellowship, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [IJCI-2017 33505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ultrasound is a safe, non-invasive and affordable imaging technique for the visualization of internal structures and the measurement of blood velocity using Doppler imaging. However, despite all these advantages, no study has identified the structures of the rat brain using conventional ultrasound. Methods: A 13 MHz high frequency transducer was used to identify brain structures in the rat. The enlargement of the transcranial window was performed gradually using the ultrasound directly on the skin of the animal, then against the skull, then through a delimited craniotomy and finally through a complete craniotomy. Results: Our results showed that ultrasound allowed the identification of cerebral ventricles and subarachnoid cisterns, as well as the analysis of real-time monitoring of cerebral blood flow in the main brain arteries of the rat. Comparison with existing methods: Ultrasound is a tool with the potential to identify brain structures and blood vessels. In contrast to MRI, transcranial ultrasound is a fast, non-invasive, well tolerated and low-cost method and can be done at the bedside. Conclusion: In the present study, we described an atlas of the main brain structures as well as the main vasculature in the rat using ultrasound. This technique could be applied in animal models of various neurological diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据