4.6 Article

Characteristics of multidentate schiff base ligand and its complexes using cyclic voltammetry, fluorescence, antimicrobial behavior and DFT-calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1224, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129263

关键词

Schiff base; Electrochemical; Fluorescence; Density functional theory; Antimicrobial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical behavior and antimicrobial activity of metal complexes derived from a Schiff base ligand was studied, showing good oxidation-reduction properties and inhibition efficiency against bacteria.
The electrochemical behavior of a series of the metal complexes [Fe(III), Ni(II), Ru(III),Pd(II) and Hf(IV)]derived from the Schiff base ligand(E)-5-((phenyl(-pyridin-2-yl) methylene) amino) pyrimidine-2,4(1H, 3H)-dione(H2L) which was previously prepared from condensation of 5-aminouracil and 2-benzoylpyridine was studied by using cyclic voltammetric technique. The Schiff base ligand H2L and its metal complexes exhibited quasi- reversible oxidation- reduction with three electron transfer and it was suggested that their reactions on the platinum surface electrode are not purely diffusion controlled but also under adsorption control. The redox reactive sites of the H2L and its complexes were located via the geometry optimization and frequency calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/LanL2DZ level of theory. In addition, the Schiff base ligand and its metal complexes exhibit fluorescent properties. The antimicrobial activity of the Schiff base ligand H2L and its metal complexes was tested against Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus(,Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and fungal strain (Aspergillus niger) by using agar well-diffusion method. The microbial testes of the ligand (H2L) and its metal complexes exhibited good inhibition efficiency to prevent growth of bacteria. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据