4.7 Article

High-permeability and anti-fouling nanofiltration membranes decorated by asymmetric organic phosphate

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 617, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118667

关键词

Nanofiltration membranes; Interfacial polymerization; Asymmetric organic phosphoric acid; High-permeability; Anti-fouling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21701084, 21878146]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Fund Outstanding Youth Project [BK20190037]
  3. Jiangsu Students' Platform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [201910291103Y]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a high-performance NF membrane based on the modification by an asymmetric hydrophilic zoledronic acid (ZA) to overcome the trade-off effect and membrane fouling. ZA played multiple roles in the membrane, enhancing permeability and anti-fouling properties, with great potential for application in water treatment.
Aiming at the two challenging bottlenecks of trade-off effect and membrane fouling that limit the development of nanofiltration (NF) membranes, this work developed a high-performance NF membrane based on the modification by an asymmetric hydrophilic zoledronic acid (ZA). ZA plays multiple roles: (1) the self-restrictive diffusion effect of piperazine (PIP)/ZA obtained from the reaction of PIP and ZA resulted in smooth membrane surface; (2) the imidazolyl on ZA uninvolved in interfacial polymerization (IP) led to enlarged polyamide network pores and provided more solvent tunnels; (3) all groups of ZA improved the membrane hydrophilicity; (4) the electronegative phosphate groups made a significant contribution to the strong membrane surface electronegativity. As a result, the ZA-modified membrane exhibited nearly five times higher permeability than that of traditional NF membranes, accompanied by perfect selectivity of SO42- and Cl- as well as the outstanding anti-fouling property, indicating its enormous application prospect in water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据