4.7 Article

Solvent effects on diffusion channel construction of organosilica membrane with excellent CO2 separation properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 618, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118758

关键词

Carbon capture; Organosilica membrane; Solvent effect; Network engineering; Gas separation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), R.O.C. [MOST 109-2221-E-040-002-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BTESE-derived organosilica membranes were prepared using sol-gel method with tailored network through different solvents and membrane thickness, showing high ideal selectivity for gas separation due to controlled mechanism by molecular sieving and selective surface diffusion.
In this work, bis (triethoxysilyl) ethane (BTESE)-derived organosilica membranes were fabricated via the sol-gel method. To obtain organosilica membranes with high perm-selectivity, the network of the membrane was tailored by using different solvents in the preparation of the BTESE-derived sol with different pore sizes and network structures. A solvent with small polarity and a small dielectric constant (epsilon r) can lead to outstanding single gas separation performance on the membrane structure, because the precursors are completely hydrolyzed and effectively stacked into a dense structure, which is beneficial for forming a suitable network for gas separation. The influence of the solvent and membrane thickness on the BTESE-derived membrane were evaluated to determine the mechanism responsible for the separation; this mechanism was found to be controlled not only by molecular sieving but also by selective surface diffusion. The results show that the BTESE-derived membrane prepared using tetrahydrofuran as the solvent exhibited a small network with an optimum thickness (three coating cycles) and led to a high ideal selectivity for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N-2, with selectivity values of 33 and 38, respectively; additionally, the permeance of CO2 was 6.32 x 10(-8) mol m(-2) s(-1) Pa-1 at 25 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据